Notification texts go here. Buy Now!

Why Should Plastic Water Bottles Be Banned

Why Should Plastic Water Bottles Be Banned

Why Should Plastic Water Bottles Be Banned – Americans consumed 14.4 billion gallons of bottled water in 2019, up 3.6% from 2018, a steady upward trend since 2010. In 2016, old soft water drinks were first released, and it has continued to do so every year since. it is the number one packaged drink in the United States. Bottled water revenue in 2020 was $61,326 million as of June 15, and the total market is expected to grow to $505.19 billion by 2028. [50] [52] [52]

Globally, approximately 20,000 secondhand plastic bottles were purchased in 2017, most of which contained drinking water. More than half of these bottles are not submitted for recycling, and only 7% of the recycled ones are turned into new bottles. [49]

Table of Contents

Why Should Plastic Water Bottles Be Banned

In 2013, Concord, MA became the first city in the United States to ban single-use plastic water, which causes environmental problems and waste. Since then, many cities, colleges, entertainment venues and national parks have followed suit, including San Francisco, the University of Vermont, the Detroit Zoo, and Grand Canyon National Park. [17] [26] [44].

Big Companies That Are Getting Rid Of Plastic For Good

Pro 1 Banning bottled water shall reduce waste and protect the environment. About 70% of plastic water bottles purchased in the US in 2015 were not recycled, most of which end up in landfills or the ocean, harming ecosystems and poisoning animals. Plastic water bottles were the third most collected litter in the International Coastal Ocean Conservancy, behind cigarette butts and plastic food packets. By 2050, estimates suggest there will be more plastic waste in the ocean than fish. [3] [4] Almost all plastic water bottles are made from polyethylene terephthalate, which is a raw material from natural gas. The Pacific Institute found that producing enough plastic to bottle the water Americans consumed in 2006 required about 17 million barrels of oil. Since 2006, US bottled water consumption has grown 65% from 8.3 billion cubic meters in 2006 to 13.7 billion cubic meters in 2017, increasing the need for plastic water bottles and thus more oil and gas. [5] [6] [7] Between 2012 and 2016, plastic water bottle bans in 23 US national parks (annually) prevented the purchase of up to 2 million plastic water bottles and up to 111,743 pounds of PET from production. [17] The nation’s bottled water ban will result in an estimated 68 billion fewer plastic water bottles produced, purchased, used and discarded. [2] Read more

Pro 2 Banning bottled water is good for your health. Bottled water is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and requires weekly testing; Tap water is more strictly regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency through several daily tests. [9] A study by Orb Media and the State University of New York found that bottled water samples contained almost twice as many pieces of microplastics per liter (10.4) as standard water samples (4.45) with 93% of bottles exhibiting certain standards. microplastic pollution. [10] A study published in Environmental Science & Technology found that the chemical antimony (Sb) can leach from plastic bottles into water. After six months of storage at room temperature, the release of antimony (Sb) increased by an average of 90% in 48 water samples from 11 countries. Exposure to antimony (Sb) can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated blood cholesterol, and low blood sugar. [12] [13] Prohibiting water filtration would reduce the number of plastic bottles that emit harmful chemicals in the process. Studies show that plant communities living around PET suffer from increased levels of chronic diseases and birth defects. In Corpus Christi, Texas, home to America’s largest pet plant, failure rates are 84% higher than the national average. [21] Read more

For 3 Water will save money by preventing spillage, and the public fountains are convenient and plentiful. Bottled water is expensive. It can cost between 400 and 2,000 times more than a gallon of water, four times more than a gallon of milk and three times more than a gallon of gasoline. [1] [15] Mathematicians at Penn State University estimate that spending $20 on a reusable water bottle could save the average American up to $1,236 a year. For a family of four, this is about $5,000. [16] Limiting plastic water bottle waste will also save local money. According to Food & Water Watch, States can spend US$100 million a year to process such wastes. California, Oregon and Washington spend about $500 million a year to remove trash from the Pacific coast, including plastic water bottle waste. [1] [36] In San Francisco, where single-use plastic bottles are banned, 31 fountains have been added to public spaces, and 20 more are planned in New York, where Mayor Bill DeBlasio has banned single-use water bottles by executive order. February 2020. As of 2015, there are 51 water sources, and another 500 are planned by 2025. When public water sources are readily available, people can fill reusable water bottles. [17] [45] [53] Read more

Pro 4 Banning bottled water would protect local water supplies. About 64% of water withdrawn comes from municipal water sources, which can draw water sources used by local communities. [1] Nestle, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo continued to use and export water from public lands and municipalities during the drought, as 25% reductions in water use were imposed on states and municipalities. [18] In Michigan, the state allowed Nestle to pump clean water and drink from public supplies while local residents in Flint fought for access to clean water. [24] In Pakistan, groundwater levels in a village close to a factory have been breached, causing the local water supply to turn to sludge. [35] According to Dr. Matthew Davis, an adjunct professor of geoscience at the University of New Hampshire, “due to droughts, lakes and reservoirs can dry up or drain nearby streams.” [34] Read more

Hand Squashing Empty Plastic Water Bottle Resembling Ban Of Single Use Plastic Recycle Stock Photo

Con 1 Banning bottled water removes healthy choices and leads to increased consumption of sugary drinks. Increased consumption of zero-calorie sparkling water instead of calorie-free soda and soft drinks cuts trillions of calories from the American diet. [25] Michael c. Bellas, president and CEO of Beverage Marketing Corporation, says, “Imagine a person who downed 161 hot dogs, 126 donuts, or 87 cheeseburgers last year. We are talking about this type of difference when the number of calories saved is the number from this diffusion transition to diffusion water. [25] In August 2017, the National Park Service suspended its plan to encourage national parks to ban the sale of plastic water bottles, saying it “removed the ban on the best beverage of choice … while still allowing the sale of sugar-sweetened beverages.” [28] The International Bottled Water Association noted that “research shows that if tap water is not available, 63 percent of people will choose sparkling water or another sugar-sweetened beverage.” [27] In spring 2013, the University of Vermont banned the sale of single-use plastic water bottles on campus. The ban resulted in increased sales of caloric drinks instead of zero-calorie water; Sales of low-calorie beverages (10-50 calories) increased by 12%, juices by 11%, and sugar-sweetened beverages by 10%. [26] Read more

Con 2 Other plastic drink containers are more harmful than plastic water bottles, and bans do not necessarily reduce waste. Plastic water bottles contain much less polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic than soda bottles, which require a thicker plastic container for the beverage’s carbonation—9.89 pounds for PET versus 23.9 pounds for a 16.9-oz bottle. A quantitative study found that between 2007 and 2015, bottled water suppliers reduced the amount of material used in 8 oz-2.5 gallon plastic water bottles by 42.8%. [40] Another quantitative study, commissioned by Nestle Waters, found that the packaging and distribution of “sports drinks, fortified water and soft drinks have almost 50% more carbon dioxide emissions per serving than bottled water”. [41] Plastic water bottles account for 3.3% of all beverage packaging in US landfills, which is less than plastic soda containers (13.3%) and aluminum cans (7.9%). [8] A University of Vermont plastic water bottle move study found that overall plastic bottle carry actually increased by 20% as consumers increased their consumption of less healthy soft drinks instead of switching to plastic bottles and drinking from soda. [26] Read more

Con 3 Bottled Water is a practical source of water for emergencies. If water is not safe to drink, bottled water is a substitute, making its availability critical to public health. Readi.gov, the Homeland Security Preparedness Guide for preparing for natural and man-made disasters, advises everyone to “purchase commercially distilled water and store it in its original, sealed container in a cool, foggy place.” [46] In April 2014, Flint, MI city officials changed the water supply

Why plastic bags should not be banned, should plastic water bottles be banned, why should plastic be banned, plastic bags should not be banned, why should abortions be banned, why should plastic bags be banned, why should plastic straws be banned, why should water bottles be banned, should water bottles be banned, why books should not be banned, should plastic be banned, why should animal testing be banned

About the Author

0 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  1. Why Should Plastic Water Bottles Be BannedIn 2013, Concord, MA became the first city in the United States to ban single-use plastic water, which causes environmental problems and waste. Since then, many cities, colleges, entertainment venues and national parks have followed suit, including San Francisco, the University of Vermont, the Detroit Zoo, and Grand Canyon National Park. [17] [26] [44].Big Companies That Are Getting Rid Of Plastic For GoodPro 1 Banning bottled water shall reduce waste and protect the environment. About 70% of plastic water bottles purchased in the US in 2015 were not recycled, most of which end up in landfills or the ocean, harming ecosystems and poisoning animals. Plastic water bottles were the third most collected litter in the International Coastal Ocean Conservancy, behind cigarette butts and plastic food packets. By 2050, estimates suggest there will be more plastic waste in the ocean than fish. [3] [4] Almost all plastic water bottles are made from polyethylene terephthalate, which is a raw material from natural gas. The Pacific Institute found that producing enough plastic to bottle the water Americans consumed in 2006 required about 17 million barrels of oil. Since 2006, US bottled water consumption has grown 65% from 8.3 billion cubic meters in 2006 to 13.7 billion cubic meters in 2017, increasing the need for plastic water bottles and thus more oil and gas. [5] [6] [7] Between 2012 and 2016, plastic water bottle bans in 23 US national parks (annually) prevented the purchase of up to 2 million plastic water bottles and up to 111,743 pounds of PET from production. [17] The nation's bottled water ban will result in an estimated 68 billion fewer plastic water bottles produced, purchased, used and discarded. [2] Read morePro 2 Banning bottled water is good for your health. Bottled water is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration and requires weekly testing; Tap water is more strictly regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency through several daily tests. [9] A study by Orb Media and the State University of New York found that bottled water samples contained almost twice as many pieces of microplastics per liter (10.4) as standard water samples (4.45) with 93% of bottles exhibiting certain standards. microplastic pollution. [10] A study published in Environmental Science & Technology found that the chemical antimony (Sb) can leach from plastic bottles into water. After six months of storage at room temperature, the release of antimony (Sb) increased by an average of 90% in 48 water samples from 11 countries. Exposure to antimony (Sb) can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, elevated blood cholesterol, and low blood sugar. [12] [13] Prohibiting water filtration would reduce the number of plastic bottles that emit harmful chemicals in the process. Studies show that plant communities living around PET suffer from increased levels of chronic diseases and birth defects. In Corpus Christi, Texas, home to America's largest pet plant, failure rates are 84% higher than the national average. [21] Read moreFor 3 Water will save money by preventing spillage, and the public fountains are convenient and plentiful. Bottled water is expensive. It can cost between 400 and 2,000 times more than a gallon of water, four times more than a gallon of milk and three times more than a gallon of gasoline. [1] [15] Mathematicians at Penn State University estimate that spending $20 on a reusable water bottle could save the average American up to $1,236 a year. For a family of four, this is about $5,000. [16] Limiting plastic water bottle waste will also save local money. According to Food & Water Watch, States can spend US$100 million a year to process such wastes. California, Oregon and Washington spend about $500 million a year to remove trash from the Pacific coast, including plastic water bottle waste. [1] [36] In San Francisco, where single-use plastic bottles are banned, 31 fountains have been added to public spaces, and 20 more are planned in New York, where Mayor Bill DeBlasio has banned single-use water bottles by executive order. February 2020. As of 2015, there are 51 water sources, and another 500 are planned by 2025. When public water sources are readily available, people can fill reusable water bottles. [17] [45] [53] Read morePro 4 Banning bottled water would protect local water supplies. About 64% of water withdrawn comes from municipal water sources, which can draw water sources used by local communities. [1] Nestle, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo continued to use and export water from public lands and municipalities during the drought, as 25% reductions in water use were imposed on states and municipalities. [18] In Michigan, the state allowed Nestle to pump clean water and drink from public supplies while local residents in Flint fought for access to clean water. [24] In Pakistan, groundwater levels in a village close to a factory have been breached, causing the local water supply to turn to sludge. [35] According to Dr. Matthew Davis, an adjunct professor of geoscience at the University of New Hampshire, "due to droughts, lakes and reservoirs can dry up or drain nearby streams." [34] Read moreHand Squashing Empty Plastic Water Bottle Resembling Ban Of Single Use Plastic Recycle Stock Photo